We reached in the preceding post to a proposition which insisted that a connected set on the real number line was a interval. So, we shall give a brief proof of the proposition.
Suppose that $I$ is a connected set on the real number line
and $I=A\cup B$ , where $A,B\subset \mathbb{R}$ , $A\cap B=\phi$
and both $A$ and $B$ are closed and not empty.
We are able to choose two points $a_1$ from $A$ and $b_1$ from $B$ , and put $a_1<b_1$ .
Dividing the new interval $(a_1,b_1)$ in half, the one must contain points of $A$ and $B$ .
Let the one be a small interval $(a_2,b_2)$ and we repeat the same operation.
Then, we get the sequence of the interval $(a_n,b_n)$ where $a_n\in A$ and $b_n\in B$
and $(a_n,b_n)\supset (a_{n+1},b_{n+1})$ .
If the operation is repeated infinitely, as the new interval becomes smaller and smaller, the real number sequence $a_n$ and $b_n$ have a same limit point $c$ .
As $A$ and $B$ are closed, $c$ is a intersection point of two sets. However, it is in contradiction to the precondition.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿