A measure $m$ is a set function which maps a subset in the measure spaces to a real number.
\[ m: a\in\mathcal{F}\rightarrow m(a)=x\in\mathbb{R} \]
, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a family of subsets of the measure space.
What conditions are needed for a measure $m$ as a set function?
\[ m: a\in\mathcal{F}\rightarrow m(a)=x\in\mathbb{R} \]
, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a family of subsets of the measure space.
What conditions are needed for a measure $m$ as a set function?
On standard
definitions (or finally reached definitions), it is as follows;
(1) for any $a\in\mathcal{F}$ , $m(a)\geq 0$ ,
(2) $m(\phi)=0$ ,
(3) if $a_1,a_2,\cdots\in\mathcal{F}$ , $a_i\cap a_j=\phi (i\ne j)$ , then $m(\cup a_i)=\sum m(a_i)$ ($i,j=1,2,\cdots $)
You may think it is very natural. Perhaps it is fairly accurate in terms of finite operations or various sets having a number of good shapes.
However, there are very strange sets (or subsets) in a measure space.
Therefore, these conditions are closely related with the ones which the families $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets satisfy.
You may think it is very natural. Perhaps it is fairly accurate in terms of finite operations or various sets having a number of good shapes.
However, there are very strange sets (or subsets) in a measure space.
Therefore, these conditions are closely related with the ones which the families $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets satisfy.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿